<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Annoying Design &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/tag/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog</link>
	<description>redesign the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Designing For the Strengths of Different Channels</title>
		<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/12/15/designing-for-the-strengths-of-different-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/12/15/designing-for-the-strengths-of-different-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising and marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practicies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changes over time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamekillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linear narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narratives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[necessary design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv spots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video teaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/12/15/designing-for-the-strengths-of-different-channels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s difficult but necessary to design for each channel as a unit of a whole – designing for each medium’s strengths. Because taking a great TV commercial and posting it on the Web as a microsite, doesn&#8217;t make a great website – yet that&#8217;s done even by some of today’s best brands (note: just because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/12/15/designing-for-the-strengths-of-different-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do You Market Meaning?</title>
		<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/08/23/how-do-you-market-meaning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/08/23/how-do-you-market-meaning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising and marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/08/23/how-do-you-market-meaning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is so much advertising creative driven by comedy, rather than tragedy? Is it because agencies want to associate their clients&#8217; brands with positive messaging? Or maybe funny is easier to craft than sad? Whatever the case, from the first Got Milk TV spot, to today&#8217;s web-native masterpieces like Subservient Chicken, advertising in recent years [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/08/23/how-do-you-market-meaning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Web Agencies Sponsor Olympic Hopefuls?</title>
		<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/07/02/should-web-agencies-sponsor-olympic-hopefuls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/07/02/should-web-agencies-sponsor-olympic-hopefuls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising and marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kolar advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul stoneham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/07/02/should-web-agencies-sponsor-olympic-hopefuls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April I wrote a post called Digital Agency Sites Suck &#8212; pretty self explanatory title &#8212; and it&#8217;s become my most-read post. I think that&#8217;s because it supports what most people feel &#8212; many agency websites are flashy, digital masturbation &#8212; not the unique, storytelling-driven expressions they should be. But here&#8217;s an interesting attempt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/07/02/should-web-agencies-sponsor-olympic-hopefuls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything I Need To Know About Marketing I Learned From Prince</title>
		<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/05/01/everything-i-need-to-know-about-marketing-i-learned-from-prince/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/05/01/everything-i-need-to-know-about-marketing-i-learned-from-prince/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising and marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[95 theses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cluetrain manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forrester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generation gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generation y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/05/01/everything-i-need-to-know-about-marketing-i-learned-from-prince/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bunch of bloggers have responded to a meme about the impending 10th anniversary of The Cluetrain Manifesto &#8212; a set of 95 theses proclaiming that the business world needs to humanize and be more communicative with consumers. Now, pardon me if that brief synopsis wasn&#8217;t accurate &#8212; I&#8217;ve never actually read Cluetrain, just have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/05/01/everything-i-need-to-know-about-marketing-i-learned-from-prince/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession Rap Session</title>
		<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/26/recession-rap-session/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/26/recession-rap-session/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising and marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/26/recession-rap-session/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough about us being in a recession people. There&#8217;s so much talk as though we are already in one, and about what tactics to take as a result. But yet no one is talking about WHY or HOW we we got here. And how we will get out. Josh and Charlene from Forrester have their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/26/recession-rap-session/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executives: Bring Back the Old Fashion Suggestion Box</title>
		<link>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/06/executives-bring-back-the-old-fashion-suggestion-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/06/executives-bring-back-the-old-fashion-suggestion-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising and marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/06/executives-bring-back-the-old-fashion-suggestion-box/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So many large organizations today have executives and managers that focus all their time and effort on evangelizing, rationalizing and internally marketing corporate strategy and decisions among employees. With internal blogs, memos, company meetings. Bruce Temkin would probably call these types &#8220;psychotic.&#8221; It&#8217;s a logical thing to do when you need to get an army [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annoyingdesign.org/blog/2008/02/06/executives-bring-back-the-old-fashion-suggestion-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

