Archive for the 'advertising and marketing' Category



02
May

Weekly Link LoDown: May 02, 2008

Here’re a few essentials I’ve come across from the past few days…

George Lois says “Advertising is Poison Gas” … and uses the word “bupkis” in this AdWeek video. He seems like he’d be a kick-ass guy to have a beer with.

Wal-Mart backs down … from suing it’s own employee that was left severely brain damaged for the $470,000 it paid for her medical expenses.

Microsoft Surface Launches in AT&T Stores … and now we no longer have to wonder: “if I touch an iPhone to a Microsoft product in an AT&T store — will the world implode?”

Need to relax? Blow some s**t up! … A new study in the U.K. has found that playing online violent games actually reduces anger and relaxes gamers.

Microsoft Research and the future of human computer interaction … says that by 2020, the field of HCI will finally replace the term “user” with “human.” To paraphrase my CMU professor Randy Pausch, ” i like to say ‘guest’ rather than ‘user.’ We’re creating products and inviting people to participate, not making things for druggies.”

Sending Out An SMS - About Youth Volunteering … Gen Y wants to be socially active — but only if you make it easy for them.

10 Social Networking Trends … that I apparently have not been paying attention to include “continuous partial attention.” I’m sorry, what did you say?

Questions a job candidate should ask in an interview
… Advergirl continues her career-focused posts to help youngin’s like me make in in the industry. But she also cites me as a “favorite agency leaders.” What’s the emoticon for blushing?.

Drop it like it’s hot — in India … last but not least, Indian “baby dropping” makes it on to mainstream media (CNN). Is anyone else kind of freaked out by this?

…TGIF.

01
May

Everything I Need To Know About Marketing I Learned From Prince

A bunch of bloggers have responded to a meme about the impending 10th anniversary of The Cluetrain Manifesto — a set of 95 theses proclaiming that the business world needs to humanize and be more communicative with consumers.

cluetrain logo

Now, pardon me if that brief synopsis wasn’t accurate — I’ve never actually read Cluetrain, just have heard of and about it from numerous colleagues. But the essence of the book is so agreeable and obvious to me — it’s what Forrester’s Social Computing (Groundswell) is about. It’s Web 2.0, social media, yadda yadda (although Cluretrain having been published in 2000, was way ahead of its time).

But as Jason Falls points out in his meme response, the business world still hasn’t caught up after a decade:

“We’re nowhere. Social media and true consumer-centric brand behavior is prevalent in the technology bubble and few other places. While adoption has been steady and progress has been made, the premise of the book hasn’t exactly “gone viral.” Businesses in general still think bottom line and “what’s in it for me,” first. Advertising still sucks, is loud and intrusive. And consumers still have little reason to trust brands, companies and even folks like me – marketers trying to connect them with products and services that fit their needs.”

Time and again working with Forrester clients, I notice how they struggle to “get it.” Even execs at great, well-respected brands have a hard time embracing social media and allowing consumers to own their bread and butter, and an especially difficult time getting buy-in for things like social networking or participatory design from higher-ups. And I can’t help but wonder how much of this is a generation gap — and will simply take a generational leap.

I’m 26 — the end of “Generation Y,” born 1981. My so far short career in the business/design/marketing world has always lived both feet in the Web (I first signed on when I was 12 on a 486). I read up on black and red boxes, hacking into the phone system, before I graduated high school — the hacker movement in essence being that democratization of information and access that people see the Web as today.

Just in the same way that, when I look at my 18 yr old brother typing at lightning speed on a Sidekick, I’m kinda blown away by what he can do with technology. There’s just that “digital-native” leap that’s going on with 40-something execs unwillingness to fully embrace social media. Perhaps it will just take a few years until my generation has our time running the companies of the world for that change to happen? The Zuckerbergs of the world sure get it.

zuckerberg facebook

Which brings me to the title of this post. In Purple Rain, Prince beats out the antagonist pop local celebrity, who’s main song is the trite “Bird Dance,” with the emotive pop anthem Purple Rain. And then tops it off with I would die 4 U. He overcomes the popular thought of his time — candy-coated marketing fluff — with honest, emotional sincerity.For the past decade we’ve been saturated as a culture from marketing messages, at all angles, and channels, that are surface-y rather than cerebral, comical rather than emotional, pedantic and trite, rather than meaningful,and usually based on popular cultural symbols, rather than deeper human truths.

What we really long for as individuals though are meaningful connections. Emotional, personal and significant moments. That’s in essence what social computing is all about. A revolution (or revolt-ution) against the trite, pedantic marketing that we’ve been fed for so long. We don’t want to be talked down to — we want to communicate with each other. Messaging vs. meaning.

Anyway, I’ll get to reading Cluetrain. One of these days.

purple rain

11
Apr

Goodby+Silverstein: Don’t create sites for yourselves!

Viral microsites don’t adhere to the same usability and user experience rules as transactional, corporate dot com sites. But they still should be understandable even in an isolated context. Why? Because you never know how a consumer will enter a viral experience. Which is why I’m so frustrated with this microsite, part of a larger viral campaign that includes YouTube videos, a MySpace and a Facebook profile.

Whitegoldiswhitegold.com, a new microsite for the California Milk Board by Goodby, Silverstein & Partners. The site features a kitschy white-haired rock god who I’m guessing got that way from enhancing his rock & roll mojo with the greatness of milk.

WhiteGold

The site’s production value is similar to what Sir Michael Phillip “Mick” Jagger probably sees when he’s on massive amounts of amphetamines. Stunning visuals with a fantastic aesthetic of white gold hues, awesome quality video and hysterical lyrics to a rock ballad.

But this site is one of the lamest things I’ve seen in a while, because it is a fantastic example of advertisers creating ads for themselves, not for consumers. So, here is a letter to the editor, so to speak. Goodby+Silverstein, you’re welcome to respond:

Dear Execs At Goodby, Silverstein & Partners,

Stop wasting your talent, time and your client’s advertising dollars on microsites that may win awards, but will only frustrate consumers and distotore brand impressions.

Your new site made me giggle. However, the experience provided no clear call to action or value on the onset, and nothing to prompt users to share it with others. Loosely integrated, disjunct viral campaigns don’t work — people want continuous, progressive experiences.

One can only assume you see your client’s target audience as some sort of “milk enthusiast,” stark-raving mad for digital marketing. Is it?

Sincerely,

- Ross

07
Apr

Digital Agency Sites Suck

When a quick-witted VP at Forrester was once asked why Forrester’s website is so awful, despite us having a multi-million dollar business in helping clients with their sites, the VP said: “the cobbler’s kids always have the worst shoes.” But should this be true of firms that actually make web sites?

For a few years now, some of the biggest digital agencies in the world have had awful web sites. Awful because they provided little to no compelling content that expressed the ethos of their agency, their point-of-view on the digital space, and the emotional tone of their past work.

Plus, most digital agencies’ sites always seemed to say the same thing and look the same way. An animated logo there, some rich, photography there that has nothing to do with their agency, and some copy that tries to sound nonchalantly confident. In fact, most digital agency sites have looked even worse than traditionally agencies. Compare Avenue A’s site to Leo Burnett’s, for example — the latter has a totally innovative web interface, while Ave A’s site has been the same few pages for the past three years.

Recently, two major agencies have redesigned their sites: R/GA and Critical Mass. Surprisingly or not, these sites have some visual similarities. But they are certainly a step forward.

I say it over and over — today’s digital agencies need to do two things:

  1. Become a full-house strategic advisory to your clients — a strategy partner that leads them through the murky waters of the social web, WOM, and new media, and how that doesn’t just tie to a Web site, but to an entire business, instead of being just a production company.
  2. If you’re going to talk the talk, you better walk the walk. And that starts with a unique Web site which expresses how you view the world, and what makes your work and approach a unique one.

So, kudos R/GA and Critical Mass for taking a stab at this. Digitas however still doesn’t get it. Can you please explain how random stock photography, and a web-generic layout will make any client want to partner with you?

RGA-home2008

 

RGA’s home page (above) showcases recent work with a strong focus on branding them as the agency of the “digital age.” [click image to expand]

 

CM-home2008

 

CriticalMass’ home page (above) has got some random animation and links to the social web, like their flicker and twitter pages [click image to expand] (not sure why it’s two big for my browser window though.)

28
Mar

The coolest shyt I’ve ever seen: Modernista’s website

Modernista! is a Boston-based full service agency with a Web site that puts those of most large interactive agencies to shame. It evokes an incredulous response when you first open it up — “is this really a website???”

modernista 1

The fully functional left hand navigation menu brings you to the agency’s portfolio not by linking you, but by showing you their Flickr page. Or their Facebook group…. all while keeping that left hand nav integrated on the page.

It’s a completely simple idea — that says so much about this agency’s view of the world, and of the interactive space. Which is an important point I want to make: you’ve got to walk the walk and talk the talk.

Far too many interactive agencies have lackluster sites that do not truly express or articulate their mission or world-view. If you’re going to try and persuade clients that you get the social Web, shouldn’t you actively embrace it yourself?

Modernista! does… and it’s some of the coolest shyt I’ve ever seen.

14
Mar

why us kidz love 80s retro

 

There’s a reason why my 18 year-old kid brother Jake loves watching VH1’s I love the 80s. Even though he was born in 1990. The kitschy, fashion-insane era of the 80s captures his interests much more than the 70s or 90s.

There’s just something about big hair and tight gold pants that makes ya wanna dance.

So how does young consumers’ love for the 80’s reflect in their behavior and attitudes? Youth-friendly brands like American Apparel and Urban Outfitters, whether they’re trying to or not (probably not), pay homage to the 80’s with their product lines and advertising.

Urban Outfitters’ line of home electronics, like USB-connected tape decks and iPod boom boxes, is tears-for-fears terrific. Media is looking back to the Regan era too, with the new Knight Rider.

But so how do “us kidz” — specifically Gen Y — interact with products and media to bring us a taste of the 80s retro pallet we love? Here’s some observations, split into five areas:

  • CONTENT: Web content = memory recall. You Tube lets us reminisce on songs from Starship, or commercials with George Costanza singing about McDonald’s… even if we weren’t there to see it first, like my kid bro.
  • ENTERTAINMENT: Movies are our way back. With the drop in cost of DVD duplication a few years ago, obscure 80s films are making new fan followings. Like my favorite
  • MARKETING: Leslie & the LY’s, the internet celeb with gem sweaters, know whats up.
  • AESTHETICS: It’s not fun unless it’s fugly (Yea, that stands for fucking-ugly). The rise of the amature MySpace aesthetic, brought on by the democratization of design and style on the Web, ties nicely in the 80s retro… where it often seemed to be the uglier the better.
02
Mar

Do Agencies Get Social Media?

There was an AdWeek story titled “Agencies Don’t Get Social Media” (subscription required) last week. Former Forrester Analyst Jim Nail (he’s now CMO at TNS Media Intelligence/Cymfony) was quoted in it:

“The perceived lack of social media competence at agencies will present opportunities for new providers, Nail predicted, as too many agencies hew narrowly to their niche, whether it’s media, creative or PR — something backed up by client feedback.”

I’ve been speaking with lots of creative leaders at agencies like R/GA, Organic, and Avenue-A for my Gen Y research at Forrester lately, and in my view this is only a perceived lack of social media expertise, not a missing competency.

Agency clients see social media campaigns as another marketing channel, while forward-looking creative types inside agencies see social media work and community building as a natural way to support brands in a Web 2.0 world. How can agencies communicate the value of social media more effectively to their clients? I think the answer lies in brand monitoring, and building an ROI case for social media investments. But I’m curious to hear your thoughts — why are today’s interactive agencies seen as missing the mark with social media?




 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to Google Reader or Homepage

August 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031